KnowThyNeighbor.org lists the names of those who oppose rights for Same Sex Couples, including the right to marry and the right to adopt and foster children.
Sorry for the confusion.
Monday, October 26, 2009
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Is the pen mightier?
Chicago Tribune Article.
Last week, the Supreme Court voted to block the release of over 138,000 names of Washington State residents who were seeking to repeal a law regarding same-sex/domestic partnerships. The vote, scheduled for November 3rd, was proposed through petitions of Washington State residents to get this piece of monumental legislation on the ballot.
Gay-rights activists in Washington State have begun this latest battle by posting the results of petitions on the internet to “expose supporters of anti-gay measures.”
Aaron Toleos, co-founder of KnowThyNeighbor.org has published close to one million names online of individuals who oppose same-sex marriage legislation in Massachusetts, Florida, Arkansas and Oregon. This matter of public record has posed the question to law makers across the country: Are political petitions a matter of public record? And if so, how can we as citizens protect an individuals right to privacy once those public records are posted on the Internet for all to see?
As someone who supports Gay Marriage/Domestic Partner rights, I am personally stunned by Toleos actions. I find it appalling that someone who stands up to injustice and fights for equality would be part of something that would persecute the beliefs of another person. I do not believe that you have a right to take a petition and use to harass, intimidate or otherwise persecute the body that petition represents. Go to the website: names, addresses are posted there for all to see.
If you read the article in today's Trib, Toleos states: "We don't ask people to go confront strangers. This is about finding someone they already now ... and having a civil dialogue." What Toleos fails to understand is that where there is a cause to fight for, there will always be extremists who will not only put themselves in harms way, but will cause damage to other people and their property.
When the extremists of either side of an argument display their views irrationally, it weakens to the argument of those who are rational. I believe that this will get resolved, and marriage will be legalized for all Americans. This country is great and this country is powerful. But you cannot win these fights through violence, harassment and other intimidating tactics that scare people.
It is no secret that the Western World was no fan of George W. Bush during his years in office for this exact reason. He went door to door across the world telling outlandish lies to start a war and when the world would not support them, he shut them out, called them terrorist supporters and started a national campaign which fortunately for us, did not take off (Freedom Fries?) He robbed America of her dignity and integrity. To those who are fighting for this distinguishable civil right, do you really want to be put in the same reputation bucket as George?
I thought not.
In short, I do not believe you can use your First Amendment freedoms to persecute others, especially those who share a different opinion. I'm not typically the first to necessarily admit when I'm wrong, but I can admit when the other party clearly has a stronger argument. Gay marriage supporters cannot stand up equality and safety for homosexuals if they are going to cause the same violence and persecution against those that oppose their view.
Do unto others....and it will come back to you.
Last week, the Supreme Court voted to block the release of over 138,000 names of Washington State residents who were seeking to repeal a law regarding same-sex/domestic partnerships. The vote, scheduled for November 3rd, was proposed through petitions of Washington State residents to get this piece of monumental legislation on the ballot.
Gay-rights activists in Washington State have begun this latest battle by posting the results of petitions on the internet to “expose supporters of anti-gay measures.”
Aaron Toleos, co-founder of KnowThyNeighbor.org has published close to one million names online of individuals who oppose same-sex marriage legislation in Massachusetts, Florida, Arkansas and Oregon. This matter of public record has posed the question to law makers across the country: Are political petitions a matter of public record? And if so, how can we as citizens protect an individuals right to privacy once those public records are posted on the Internet for all to see?
As someone who supports Gay Marriage/Domestic Partner rights, I am personally stunned by Toleos actions. I find it appalling that someone who stands up to injustice and fights for equality would be part of something that would persecute the beliefs of another person. I do not believe that you have a right to take a petition and use to harass, intimidate or otherwise persecute the body that petition represents. Go to the website: names, addresses are posted there for all to see.
If you read the article in today's Trib, Toleos states: "We don't ask people to go confront strangers. This is about finding someone they already now ... and having a civil dialogue." What Toleos fails to understand is that where there is a cause to fight for, there will always be extremists who will not only put themselves in harms way, but will cause damage to other people and their property.
When the extremists of either side of an argument display their views irrationally, it weakens to the argument of those who are rational. I believe that this will get resolved, and marriage will be legalized for all Americans. This country is great and this country is powerful. But you cannot win these fights through violence, harassment and other intimidating tactics that scare people.
It is no secret that the Western World was no fan of George W. Bush during his years in office for this exact reason. He went door to door across the world telling outlandish lies to start a war and when the world would not support them, he shut them out, called them terrorist supporters and started a national campaign which fortunately for us, did not take off (Freedom Fries?) He robbed America of her dignity and integrity. To those who are fighting for this distinguishable civil right, do you really want to be put in the same reputation bucket as George?
I thought not.
In short, I do not believe you can use your First Amendment freedoms to persecute others, especially those who share a different opinion. I'm not typically the first to necessarily admit when I'm wrong, but I can admit when the other party clearly has a stronger argument. Gay marriage supporters cannot stand up equality and safety for homosexuals if they are going to cause the same violence and persecution against those that oppose their view.
Do unto others....and it will come back to you.
Thursday, October 22, 2009
a few brief moments
I've decided to try to really commit to this blog -- more a cranial warm up prior to my interview for Graduate School than an actual political platform. I need to stop being afraid of what people will think of me if I put a pen to paper (or a cursor to screen in this instance) and allow my thoughts to just come. One of the things that stood in my way as an actor was my fear to just go for it, take the risk and go from where I was at. The few brief moments I let down my emotional walls were brilliant, and not a day passes where I don't crave that artistic outlet I once valued above everything else.
So what happened? I have always had a moderate heart. I've been accused of being many things in my short time on Earth from cynical to stuck up to down right bitchy. But really what I am is a person with a lot to say about a lot of things and a lack of confidence to voice it.
When I moved to Chicago, you can say I lost myself, which was interesting because I came here to find myself. I came here to make a mark, take a stand and just go for it. However, with my fear of being broke, my fear of letting my health insurance lapse and my fear of not being able to hold up my half of the financial bargain my other and I made, I suspended my goals and took a day job instead. I even managed to make myself believe that it was what I actually wanted.
And just when I thought that I could not get any more unhappy sitting under florescent lights and behind a desk, an epiphony happened: If I loved the policy of my time, and longed so much to be a part of it, what the hell was stopping me?
Since that point, I have become politically moderate, often asking myself "I understand that the President is making tough choices that I may not agree with, if I were in his shoes, I don't know where I would even begin."
For a few brief moments since this first initial intellectual break through, I have found an internal peace with myself that I never experienced.
In 14 days, I will have my interview. I would like to do at least SEVEN (7) blog postings on the following items:
Michael Steele and the GOP
The media frenzy regarding pointless stories (i,e, balloon boy, octo-mom, pointless celebrities who do nothing)
The Branding of the Democratic Party
Midterm Elections.
So. Here we go. I'm suspending my fear of judgement and simply saying to anyone who may read this...although I really don't think there's anyone (hi Rich!): BRING IT ON! If you want to debate, I'm okay with that, if you want to flat out disagree with me, go for it! I'm totally okay with a difference in opinion and may even change your mind...and maybe, just maybe, you can help me expand my own political and fundamental philosophies about the American Government.
Good night.
So what happened? I have always had a moderate heart. I've been accused of being many things in my short time on Earth from cynical to stuck up to down right bitchy. But really what I am is a person with a lot to say about a lot of things and a lack of confidence to voice it.
When I moved to Chicago, you can say I lost myself, which was interesting because I came here to find myself. I came here to make a mark, take a stand and just go for it. However, with my fear of being broke, my fear of letting my health insurance lapse and my fear of not being able to hold up my half of the financial bargain my other and I made, I suspended my goals and took a day job instead. I even managed to make myself believe that it was what I actually wanted.
And just when I thought that I could not get any more unhappy sitting under florescent lights and behind a desk, an epiphony happened: If I loved the policy of my time, and longed so much to be a part of it, what the hell was stopping me?
Since that point, I have become politically moderate, often asking myself "I understand that the President is making tough choices that I may not agree with, if I were in his shoes, I don't know where I would even begin."
For a few brief moments since this first initial intellectual break through, I have found an internal peace with myself that I never experienced.
In 14 days, I will have my interview. I would like to do at least SEVEN (7) blog postings on the following items:
Michael Steele and the GOP
The media frenzy regarding pointless stories (i,e, balloon boy, octo-mom, pointless celebrities who do nothing)
The Branding of the Democratic Party
Midterm Elections.
So. Here we go. I'm suspending my fear of judgement and simply saying to anyone who may read this...although I really don't think there's anyone (hi Rich!): BRING IT ON! If you want to debate, I'm okay with that, if you want to flat out disagree with me, go for it! I'm totally okay with a difference in opinion and may even change your mind...and maybe, just maybe, you can help me expand my own political and fundamental philosophies about the American Government.
Good night.
Thursday, October 1, 2009
the War in Chicago
Dear Mayor Daley,
On behalf of the children of Chicago, I am presenting a Call-to-Action to you and to your administration. It's time you wake up and reevaluate the game plan for the future of this city.
Taxes are high; transit is a mess and we have one of the highest unemployment rates in the country at the current moment. Aside from that, the crime rate for the city of Chicago is quickly reaching a Tipping Point of sorts and pretty soon, it will be too late to do anything about it.
The events of last week surrounding the brutal beating of Derrion Albert is terrible. My heart breaks for the family and friends of this poor boy who lost his life after being caught in the middle of a heinous act of violence. However, Mayor Daley, I encourage you to take the blinders off and face the music. This event, has rattled this city. But what has upset me even more is the indisputable fact that this is not the first tragic death of a child that this city has faced in the past month, the past year or the past decade. How many children need to die before you will wake up and start making Chicago's youth a priority for your administration?
Living in a city will always be a liability, for any one involved. The population is higher, there is higher competition for resources, including jobs and a higher concentration of all demographics. You talk about bringing the Olympics here, bringing an International population to the "fine city of Chicago" to at last seal Chicago's fate as a global major city.
On behalf of the children of Chicago, I am presenting a Call-to-Action to you and to your administration. It's time you wake up and reevaluate the game plan for the future of this city.
Taxes are high; transit is a mess and we have one of the highest unemployment rates in the country at the current moment. Aside from that, the crime rate for the city of Chicago is quickly reaching a Tipping Point of sorts and pretty soon, it will be too late to do anything about it.
The events of last week surrounding the brutal beating of Derrion Albert is terrible. My heart breaks for the family and friends of this poor boy who lost his life after being caught in the middle of a heinous act of violence. However, Mayor Daley, I encourage you to take the blinders off and face the music. This event, has rattled this city. But what has upset me even more is the indisputable fact that this is not the first tragic death of a child that this city has faced in the past month, the past year or the past decade. How many children need to die before you will wake up and start making Chicago's youth a priority for your administration?
Living in a city will always be a liability, for any one involved. The population is higher, there is higher competition for resources, including jobs and a higher concentration of all demographics. You talk about bringing the Olympics here, bringing an International population to the "fine city of Chicago" to at last seal Chicago's fate as a global major city.
The Olympic Bid will not be a magic wand to make Chicago's crime problems disappear. On the contrary, it may become the spark that ignites the fire. Our children are dying, Mayor Daley. The infrastructure of this city is crumbling, the schools are over flowing and this city cannot keep accepting this as a "expected" or "normal".
When you arrive from Denmark, with or without your precious bid, I hope you will wake up and see that aside from sky scrapers and Lake Michigan, Chicago has a lot of potential to become a super power that it hopes to be. But you have to start investing the tax dollars of the citizens in the actual city and not in your reelection campaign or any of the other under-the-table, closed door dealings we all know you are a part of.
Wake up.
Smell the pollution.
Your city needs you to start paying attention. In the mean time, I will continue to keep the families of those who have lost their children to violence in my heart and in my prayers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
